DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WOH
Docket: 13661-10
12 Apr 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of
naval record pursuant to the provisions ef 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 April 2011. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with the
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
furnished by the United States Marine Corps letter 1040
MMEA of 10 Feb 2011, a copy of which is attached. The
Board also considered your request for a personal
appearance, however it found that the issues in the case
were adequately documented and that a personal appearance
would not materially add to the Board's understanding of
the issues involved. Thus, your request for a personal
appearance has been denied.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
material error or injustice. In this connection the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
Docket: 13661-10
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are
entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05813-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board: considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) memo 1070 JAM2 of 21 Jul 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05370-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters Marine Corps letter 1811 MMSR-2 of 16 June 2010, a copy of which is attached and was previously furnished to you through counsel. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02140-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2011. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06670-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11493-10
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Commandant of the Marine Corps letters CMC 1741 MMSR-4 of 13 Jan 2011 and CMC 1741 MMSR-4 of 25 Apr 2011, copies of which are attached and were previously furnished to you. You were counseled on the “the negative impact of not completing 20 years of active duty.” There is no evidence of fraud, duress, or misrepresentation at the time you accepted the PEB findings and sought to be released from active duty. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03207-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2011. The laws and regulations governing claims for retired pay are widely available. The laws and regulations governing claims for retired pay are widely available, Almost three years have passed since you requested retired pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11359-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00709-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01246-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12260-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...