DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 11608-10
25 January 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 UySees 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HOMC memo 1610 G-1 of 18 Dec 10
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner retained half
of his time in grade from a previous enlistment, upon returning to
active duty on 27 February 2006.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 January
2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Docket No. 11608-10
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. On 27 February 2006, Petitioner reenlisted on active duty as a
Sgt/E-5 with a date of rank of 1 January 2004.
Note: Petitioner’s original date of rank to Sgt/E-5 was 1 April 2002.
Petitioner met the criteria to retain half of his original time in grade
as a Sgt/E-5 due to him spending less than 180 days off active duty.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
Ain Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
25 January 2011 \ Doo.
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di 1
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07607-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled payment of one-half separation pay when he was discharged from the Marine Corps.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05814-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of one-half separation pay when discharged from active duty on 1 February 2006.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00907-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07451-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. 7451-06 13 Nov 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of one-half...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10339-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to half separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04546-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that his final combined disability rating was not reduced to 60% when he was permanently retired. The Board, consisting of Genteman, Greene and Storz,, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02641-11
wh ee a Se ae Te DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in.effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of one-half separation pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02142-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to half separation pay at the time of separation from active duty service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09171-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of full separation pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12981-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to full separation pay when she was discharged on 12 August 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...