DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 11506-10
7 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 February 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You were honorably discharged by reason of unsatisfactory
participation in the Ready Reserve on 8 June 2000 and assigned a
reentry code of RE-4. Although the discharge processing
documents are not in your record, it appears that your commanding
officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy Reserve
by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve on
8 June 2000 and assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and overall
service record. The Board concluded that it is appropriate that
you were not recommended for reenlistment in view of your
unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
fe
eu Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE NIFRR
Executive Q3 or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06857-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2011. It appears that you reenlisted in the Naval Reserve and served until 26 July 2005, when you received a general discharge due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5501 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service, the reason for your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07896-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code due to your failure to participate in the Ready Reserve, and non-recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6512 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most appropriate reentry code based on your ‘circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06462-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00427-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2012. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04269-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval-record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ' Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of your failure to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2527 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to unsatisfactory performance in the Ready Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01678-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, th Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 9 May 1996 at age 17 and then earned three consecutive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07890-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your contentions that you were transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve and should have been advanced to PN3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...