DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS
Docket No: 11310-10
23 May 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 April 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error Or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 December
1992. You were honorably released from active duty on 22
September 1994 in pay grade E-2 by reason of reduction in force,
and assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
Service record and the contention that you had a clean
disciplinary record and that the Board concluded that those
factors were insufficient to warrant a change in the reason for
your discharge or to amend you reentry code, which was properly
assigned. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Sek SS
ROBERT DS—ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03051-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval _record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the “existence of probabl¢...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2098 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, _ you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service and desire to change your reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01065-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04400-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly asSigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09551-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances and overall record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden -is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00236-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reason for separation or RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07178-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02838-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 December 2011. If another branch of service decides to waive your reentry code and accept you for enlistment, the Navy will not object. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03424-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2011. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the -existence of pyobable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0792 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. You were released from active duty on 1 May 2011, with an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE-30 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.