Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11006-10
Original file (11006-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
_ .BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TUR
Docket No; 11006-1090
20 July 2031

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval.
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 July 2011. The names and votes of the

members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 7 July 2005 at age 20, began a period
of active duty on 28 July 2005, and served without disciplinary
incident.

On 9 March 2006, after undergoing a medical evaluation, you
stated that you did not abuse alcohol prior to enlistment.
However, about a month later, on 11 April 2006, you self-
referred for participation in a drug and alcohol rehabilitation
program due to alcohol abuse. On 17 April 2006 you were
diagnosed with alcohol dependence and recommended for inpatient
treatment, which included attending weekly Alcohol Anonymous (AA)
meetings, taking Antabuse, and refraining from consuming
alcoholic beverages. Nonetheless, it appears that you refused to
participate in the program and were recommended for an
administrative separation.

On 12 May 2006 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of convenience of the government. due
to alcohol rehabilitation failure. After waiving your procedural
rights, your commanding officer recommended an honorable
discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to
alcohol rehabilitation failure. The discharge authority approved
this recommendation and directed and on 10 July 2006, you were 50
discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, participation in post service rehabilitation, and
_desire to ‘change your reenlistment code so that you may reenlist.
“Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to Warrant a change in your record because of your
failure to participate in an alcohol rehabilitation program.
‘Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Ly ean ;
W. DEAN P F
Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12880-09

    Original file (12880-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 13 July 2006, you were notified of pending administrative separation action due to alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08000-08

    Original file (08000-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 November 2005 an ADB recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. On 2 February 2006 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04774-11

    Original file (04774-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08582-07

    Original file (08582-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 28 June 2005, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 8 March 2006, your commanding officer...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08080-08

    Original file (08080-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05555-08

    Original file (05555-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06828-09

    Original file (06828-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. , On 1 January 1990 you were referred for an evaluation due to alcohol abuse and assigned to a Level iII rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06828-09

    Original file (06828-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. , On 1 January 1990 you were referred for an evaluation due to alcohol abuse and assigned to a Level iII rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09377-08

    Original file (09377-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01891-08

    Original file (01891-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations direct the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...