Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10787-10
Original file (10787-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD: hd
Decket No. 10787-10
13 January 2011

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Te: Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 30 Sep 10 w/attachments
(2) PERS-911 ltr dtd 24 Nov 10
(3) PERS-80 memo dtd 7 Dec 10

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve with
no break in service, and that he retained his original lieutenant
date of rank of 1 June 2000.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

13 danuary 2031, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3), the
Navy Personnel Command offices with cognizance over the subject
matter of this case have commented to the effect the request has merit
and warrants favorable action, specifically, showing Petitioner
‘accepted his Navy Reserve commission on 1 March 2007, rather than
29 February 2008; and that his commission reflected a date of rank
of 1 June 2000, rather than 19 April 2001.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the
Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve
on 1 March 2007, rather than 29 February 2008.

b. That his record be corrected further to show the lieutenant
date of rank on his commission as 1 June 2000, rather than 19 April
2001; and that his lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.

c. That his anniversary date and pay entry base date be adjusted
accordingly.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board's
recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from
Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added
to the record in the future.

e. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that another
copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any
material directed to be removed from Petitioner's record, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

Aint #. [Apted~
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S&S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04142-00

    Original file (04142-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Naval Reserve on 31 March or 1 April 2000, to reflect no break in service after he left active duty on 31 March 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Schultz and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2000, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06297-11

    Original file (06297-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    06297-11 16 September 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ; REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he accepted his commission as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 1 October 2006, rather than 14 November 2007, and that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09601-09

    Original file (09601-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Vogt and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09649-09

    Original file (09649-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 20 June 2009, rather than 17 August 2009. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2010, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05092-11

    Original file (05092-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission in the Navy Reserve on 1 March 2009, rather than 3 April 2009. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman and Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04088-03

    Original file (04088-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show he accepted his commission as a lieutenant commander, Dental Corps (DC), U. S. Naval Reserve on 1 September 2002, rather than 28 October 2002; that his name be added to the list of eligibles for the Fiscal Year (FY) 04 Naval Reserve DC Commander Selection Board; and that he be promoted to commander accordingly. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR337-13

    Original file (NR337-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    injustice on 28 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determinéd that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (3), PERS-80, the NPC office with cognizance over officer promotions, has commented to the effect that once the Board has acted on Petitioner's request to change the acceptance date of his commission, his SSB request. to the Board's: recommendation be corrected, removed or entries or material be.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10087-10

    Original file (10087-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she accepted her commission. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2968 14

    Original file (NR2968 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was offered continuation to a date that allows him the opportunity to gain eligibility for Reserve retired pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03972-11

    Original file (03972-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he accepted his commission as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 2 September 2008, father than 1 April 2010, and that the lieutenant date of rank reflected on his commission was 1 June 2006, rather than 20 December 2007. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman...