DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 REC
Docket No: 10697-10
10 August 2011
Thig is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United.
States Code, section 1552. ;
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 August 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
/-Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with ail material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 26 September 1989, at age 18. On 24
May 1990, you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for being
drunk and disorderly. On 8 February 1994, you received
counseling concerning your failure to meet Navy standards during
the physical readiness test (PRT). On 27 December 1994, you
received counseling concerning your failure of the PRT. On 8
June 1995, you were recommended for administrative separation by
reason of weight control failure on three PRT cycles. On 8 June
1995, your commanding officer forwarded his recommendation that
you be discharged with a general discharge by reason of weight
control failure. You were then processed for separation by
reason of weight control failure. After you were advised of your
rights, -you elected to receive copies of documents to be
forwarded to the separation authority, but waived all your other
- procedural rights. Subsequently, on 28 June 1995, you were
discharged with a general discharge by reason of weight control
failure. At that time, you were assigned a reentry code of
RE-3T.
In its review of your application, the Board considered all
Mitigating factors, such as your youth. However, the Board found
these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your
characterization of service due to your misconduct and failure to
meet the Navy’s weight standards. The Board thus concluded that
there is no error or injustice in your characterization of
service. You are advised that an RE-3T reentry code is waivable
if you desire to reenlist. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
F
Executive ractor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08458-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. g. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of weight control failure as evidence by his failure of three PRT1s within a four year period. That Petitioner's naval record by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 15 August 1997, to RE-3T b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06312-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve applied to this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and that her reenlistment code be changed. The majority notes that there are no performance evaluations in the record after 31 January 1995. In addition, the Board notes that she was not discharged on 9 January 1997 as is usually...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04149-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 15 December 1998. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07428-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that the RE-4 reenlistment code issued on 30 May 1997 be changed to RE-1. As indicated, there is no basis in the Given the circumstances, the Board concludes that The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07322-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 7322-98 25 May 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. equests repayment of tive Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) recouped...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02597-09
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 May 1996, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of PRT failure. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03386-02
obtain copies of documents supporting g* On 12 August 1997, the commanding officer forwarded the administrative separation action to the discharge authority recommending separation due to weight control failure, with characterization of service as warranted by her service record. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3T or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of weight control failure. That Petitioner's naval record by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03282-01
d. The Board notes that the SPD code of GFT is in error because that code is only assigned when an individual is being discharged for failure of physical standards based on an approved recommendation of an administrative discharge board Petitioner was not eligible for an ADB and such a board was not convened. This code will The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01888-01
On 14 November 1994 you and were ordered to The record reflects that on 26 June 1995 you were advised that you did not meet the Navy's weight and body fat standards and would be enrolled in the command's remedial physical conditioning program until the next official physical readiness test (PRT). On 3 December 1997 the commanding officer directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. In addition to In that On 21 December 2000 the Naval...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00940
960405: Commanding Officer, USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN, advised BUPERS that member was discharged on 8 April 1996 with an Honorable by reason of weight control failure as evidenced by failing three physical readiness tests on 10 November 1994, May 1995 and November 1995. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960408 with a general (under honorable conditions) for weight control failure due to not meeting the prescribed physical...