Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10474-10
Original file (10474-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DIC
Docket No. 10474-10

19 Jan 11

 

.From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: _REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC Memo 1430 PERS 812 dtd 3 Dec 10
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to establish entitlement to a zone “C”, Tier 2 Reenlistment Bonus.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and

Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 10474-10

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. The 3 year reenlistment executed on or about 20 July 2005 is
null and void.

b. The 4 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS
1070/621), executed on or about 10 July 2008, is null and void.

c. The 12 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS
1070/621), executed on or about 23 October 2008, is null and void.

d. The 4 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS
1070/621), operative on or about 20 November 2009, is null and void.

e. The 6 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS
1070/621), executed on or about 22 February 2010, is null and void.

fF. The Petitioner was discharged and reenlisted on
23/24 June 2010, vice on or about 1/2 September 2010. The term is 6
years.

g. This change wilil entitle the member to a zone “C”, Tier 2
Reenlistment Bonus with an award level of $5,000 for the AWF/8252
rate/NEC.

h. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, IIt
Recorder Acting Recorder
Docket No. 10474-1090

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e)) and having assured

compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

19 Jan 11 RL gD —
: PFEIFFER

¥oO2_wW, DEAN
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09404-09

    Original file (09404-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    9404-09 8 Dec 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10034-10

    Original file (10034-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20376-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The 4 year reenlistment executed on or about 5 June 2010 is null and void.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09411-09

    Original file (09411-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . h. The Petitioner executed a 5 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), operative on or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02091-10

    Original file (02091-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10459-09

    Original file (10459-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX - , ‘WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). d. The Petitioner executed a 12 month agreement to extend enlistment (NAVPERS 1070/621), operative on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10992-09

    Original file (10992-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS), Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09949-10

    Original file (09949-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13253-09

    Original file (13253-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Tier 1 Prior Service/Affiliation Bonus. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09815-10

    Original file (09815-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05137-10

    Original file (05137-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5137-10 19 Jan 11 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj]: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The 3 year reenlistment executed on or about 10 February 2006 is...