Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09779-10
Original file (09779-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD : hd
Docket No. 09779-10
18 November 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
OLR
Re EW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.€. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 1 Sep 10 w/attachments

(2) PERS-812 memo dtd 21 Oct 10 w/attachment

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he had 14 award points, vice 10, for the Cycle 085
examination for advancement to HM1 (pay grade E-6). He impliedly
requested that his final multiple score (FMS) be adjusted accordingly
and, if the adjusted FMS is high enough, that he be advanced to HM1.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Garst and Grover, reviewed
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 November 2010,
and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective

action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with
cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case has commented
to the effect the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
That office specifically recommended changing his award points from
10 to 14, raising his FMS from 182.45 to 186.45, and advancing him
to HM1 with an effective date of 16 June 2010 and time-in-rate CITE)
date of 1 January 2010.
CONCLUSION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

 

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show he had 14 award points, vice 10, for the Cycle
085 examination for advancement to HM1; and that his FMS was 186.45,
vice 182.45.

b. That his record be corrected further to show he was advanced
to HM1 with an effective date of 16 June 2010 and TIR date of 1 January
2010

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that another
copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any
material directed to be removed from Petitioner's record, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

Deki 4. [rothen,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.
LW Dostclay
W. DEAN PF
Executive D oO

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09358-10

    Original file (09358-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Bubject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he had 10 awards points, vice 8, for the Cycle 085 examination for advancement to BM1 (pay grade E-6). The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Chapman and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06421-08

    Original file (06421-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the advancement examination profile sheet for cycle 080 February 2007 Reserve to show additional award points. The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Cooper and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2008, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6491 14

    Original file (NR6491 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 June 2010 to 15 June 2011 {copy at Tab A) to change the rate from YN3 (pay grade B-4) to YN2 (pay grade E-5). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10551 14

    Original file (NR10551 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07

    Original file (10587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10489 14

    Original file (NR10489 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting 0f§ = as reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2015 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7987 14

    Original file (NR7987 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds _the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. It is certified that quorum was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8057 14

    Original file (NR8057 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket N 26 Mar 1 NR8057-14 ul Oo From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Toe: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref :. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10541 14

    Original file (NR10541 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR10541-14 27 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07397 12

    Original file (07397 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket: 07397-12 20) November 2012 ¢ Correction of Naval Records Chairman, Board fo From: To: secretary of the Navy sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1 _ EY Ref: (a) Title 16 U.S. 1552 Encl 1) DD Form 149 w/attachments Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser B12/0548 (a) Petitioner filed in effect, that the ow that Petitioner's ination, of reference requesting, ted to sh rve advancement...