DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 09331-10
25 October 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/513
Of 27 Sep 10
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-4/ET3 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
Docket No. 09331-10
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/ET3 from the September 2009,
Navy-wide advancement examination with the effective date to be 16 June
2010, and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. — 4-4
Recorder Acting Recorder
Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
TF ed, (aves Wise
FAW. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
25 October 2010
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03750-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 03750-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD quae Ref: (a} TO UWaS:C, Is52 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/220 of 25 Apr 11 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00228-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s advancement should be back-dated to ET3/E-4 from the March 2010 Navy- wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09816-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/ET3 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02565-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 02565-11 17 May 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ic. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a correction to his service record to reflect that he was advanced to E4/ET3 from the March 2010, Navy-wide advancement exam. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07407-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/STG3 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07630-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/EM2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07581-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08207-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/MM1 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10825-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MT2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03710-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he advanced to E-6/CTI1 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...