DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 9248-10
20 September 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To Secretary of the Navy
Subj: FORMER Ainge, EVIE OF
NAVAL RECORD
Ree : (a) Title 10 U.S.C. L552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code he was assigned on 9 May 1997.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. alee iphpabe and qq
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9
September 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 27 January 1997. On
9 May 1997 he received an honorable discharge by reason of a
condition, not a disability which interfered with his performance
of duty, namely, enuresis. He was assigned a reentry code of
RE-4.
c. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of
reentry codes of RE-3G or RE-4 to individuals discharged by
reason of a condition not a disability.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable
action. The Board concludes that a reentry code of RE-3G should
now be assigned since his record does not warrant the most
stigmatizing reentry code of RE-4. A code of RE-3G will alert
recruiting personnel that there was a problem with Petitioner’s
physical during the prior enlistment which must be resolved
before reentry is authorized.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 9
May 1997, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.
b. That a copy of this Report of -Proceedings*be filed in his
naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN [ul aa
Recorder cting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
W. DEAN P i
Executive or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01123 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect a change in his reentry code issued on 22 May 1997, from RE-4 (not recommended for retention) to RE-3G condition (not physical disability) interfering with performance of duty in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The Board, consisting of Mr. Lacroix,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00973-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. The Board, consisting of Mr. yy mr. ae =: Mr. hess reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05010-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Gattis, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Although Petitioner was properly...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04362-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner ‘applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 14 June 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Siadiiitiin: , agile: “ili, and ii reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 May 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was assigned a reentry code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03193-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 12 September 1990. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ==: iii, and reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 January 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. Applicable directives authorize the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07913 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation “condition, not a disability” and “RE-3G" (condition (not a physical disability) interfering with performance of duty) reentry code be changed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 30 June 2011, he was discharged by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11884 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and particularly in light of the Army orthopedic surgeon’s diagnosis, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 January 2014, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8153 13
gM reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. She received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 25 March 2011, with an RE-4 reentry code (not recommended for retention). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she received a reentry code of “RE-3G” vice “RE-4".
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9270 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3G (condition, not disability) vice RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 7 December 1999. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0533 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into military service (other)) and the RE-4 reentry code issued on 17 February 2009, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Lapinski, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice © on 12 March 2014, and, pursuant to its...