DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 8095-10
14 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
It is noted that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) has
upgraded your undesirable discharge to a general
characterization of service.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 April 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the report of the NDRB, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments and findings
contained in the report of the NDRB. The Board was unwilling
to grant any further relief because of your one nonjudicial
punishment and conduct mark average of 3.5. A conduct mark
average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable discharge.
In view of the above, your application for relief beyond that
effected by NDRB has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
4 |
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dire
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11260-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In December 1997 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed your narrative reason for separation to Secretary of the Navy Plenary Authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11332-10
‘ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2011. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct averages computed from marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01259-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01086-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05635-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03798-10
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2011. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your character of service, given your record of three NUJP's for misconduct and insufficiently high conduct mark average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07973-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your character of service, given your record of one NUP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08999-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2011. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your low professional competence and insufficiently high overall trait average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05785-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your commanding officer forwarded his recommendation that you be discharged under other than honorable (OTH) conditions by reason of conduct. Your request for discharge was granted and on 17 August 1990, you received an OTH discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00552-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You remained on active duty until 18 July 1958 when you were discharged under general conditions at the expiration of your enlistment based on your disciplinary record and conduct mark average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...