Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07372-10
Original file (07372-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 7372-10
19 Jul 10

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a) ‘Title 10 Uls.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/380 of 9 Jul 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show he enlisted with a 24 month extension and accelerated
advancement guarantee.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Z4salman,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 July
2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 7372-10

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. Paragraph a of Annex A to the DD Form 4 reflect “I agree to
extend my enlistment for 24 months...” vice “12/12” months.

b. Option (1) of Annex A reflects “6YO Aircrew (AIRC) Program
Guarantee,” vice “S5YO Aircrew (AIRC) Program Guarantee.”

c. The 12 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, executed
on or about 9 August 2007 for “Training in the Aircrew Program,” is
null and void.

d. The 12 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, executed
on or about 9 August 2007 “To establish eligibility for the Enlistment
Bonus...,” is null and void.

e. On 9 August 2007 he executed a 24 month NAVPERS 1070/621
extension agreement to comply with the requirements of the Aircrew
program and to establish eligibility for accelerated advancement.

f. He was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 30 June 2009.

g. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 42SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, 4.
Recorder Acting Recorder
Docket No. 7372-10

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

TR RAN Ai i

-oR_ W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

19 July 2010

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11163-07

    Original file (11163-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11163-07 20 May 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO-Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify reenlistment contract.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06627-07

    Original file (06627-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00270-07

    Original file (00270-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05654-06

    Original file (05654-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5654-0631January2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. 5654-06RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11447-08

    Original file (11447-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify enlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2009 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05092-08

    Original file (05092-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02901-09

    Original file (02901-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    naval record: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment {STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and..Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04163-08

    Original file (04163-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a 12 month extension, vice a 24 month extension. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09404-09

    Original file (09404-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    9404-09 8 Dec 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01940-08

    Original file (01940-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB} and to establish an earlier effective advancement date. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. 4salman,...