DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN
Docket No: 06530-10
91 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 April 2011. - Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
afd, poliaies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 13 June 1983. The Board found that, while in recruit
training, you were seen by a psychologist and diagnosed with a
mixed personality disorder, after you were informed that you were
not going into the avionics field but were expected to go into
infantry training. The report further stated, in part, that
after an adequate period of observation, evaluation and
treatment, you had shown long standing evidence of an inherent
preexisting pathological personality disorder that precluded you
from any further military service. Subsequently, based on the
mental evaluation, you were processed for separation due to a
personality disorder. You were afforded all of your procedural
rights including the opportunity to submit a statement on your
behalf. You received an uncharacterized entry level separation
due to your physical disability which existed prior to your
enlistment on 8 November 1983.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your relatively short
period of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that these
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
characterization of service given your period of service which
was less than 180 days. Additionally, the Board noted that you
were notified of your separation process within 180 days of the
‘beginning .of your period of active service. Navy regulations
-authori'ze an uncharacterized entry level separation if the
processing of a Marine's separation begins within 180 days of his
entry on active duty. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or inyuetiee .
Sincerely,
\p
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5104 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2015. Navy regulations authorize an uncharacterized entry level separation if the processing of a Sailor’s separation begins within 180 days of his entry on active auty Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05089-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of fraudulent entry as evidenced by your concealment of your pre-service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04752-08
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations authorize an uncharacterized ELS if the processing of an individual's separation begins within 180 days of his/her entry on active service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7307 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08022-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2011. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00598-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04168-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2010. Based on the evaluation and Medical Board, you were processed for separation by reason of a physical disability that existed prior to your entry onto active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5656 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. Finally, with regard to your assertions, the Board noted that your NUP was appropriately documented in your official military personnel file in accordance with applicable regulations and there is no error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6976 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01115-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...