Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05864-10
Original file (05864-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 5864-10
24 February 2011

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 February 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed 4n accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You entered active duty in the Navy on 7 September 2004. While
at recruit training, you were diagnosed as having a passive-
aggressive personality disorder which existed prior to your
enlistment. You were found to be very unmotivated, depressed,
constantly anxious, and possibly suffering from an eating
disorder. You were administratively processed for separation
due to fraudulent entry. On 21 October 2004, you received an
uncharacterized entry level separation due to fraudulent entry,
and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention)
reentry code.

In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
current desire to serve in the armed forces. However, the
Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code should not be
changed due to your failure to disclose personality disorder.
You are advised that no reentry code is changed due merely to
the passage of time or post service good conduct. In view of
the above, your application has been denied. The names and
.votes of the membeus of the panel will be furnished upon
request. “ .

 

- It is regretted’ that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to

have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
.by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

Sincerely,

\wNeaet

W. DEAN PF
Executive tor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05525-10

    Original file (05525-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0287 14

    Original file (NR0287 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 November 2011, you signed and acknowledged that you were being administratively separated due to fraudulent entry based on your failure to disclose vital mental health information which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14

    Original file (NR0257 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04494-10

    Original file (04494-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2011. However, the Board concluded that your RE-4 reentry code should not be changed due to your non-completion of recruit training and failure to disclose your psychiatric history. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03488-10

    Original file (03488-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and polieles. Further, the Board concluded that the diagnosed ADHD and nonrecommendation ‘for retention gr reenlistment were sufficient to support the ‘assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code, which is authorized by ‘regulatory guidance. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03779-09

    Original file (03779-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03313-09

    Original file (03313-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ddécumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code due to the diagnosed personality disorders that appear to have existed prior to your entry into the service, which was not disclosed, causing your discharge by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05249-10

    Original file (05249-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were diagnosed with a depressive disorder and recommended for an uncharacterized entry level separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07898-10

    Original file (07898-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04207-07

    Original file (04207-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 4 January 2007. Accordingly and as you...