DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WJH
Docket: 5488-10
7 Sep 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 September 2010. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with the
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps letter 1800 MMSR-5
of 21 June 2010, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
material error or injustice. In this connection the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. The Board found that the policies
governing the opportunities to earn retirement points
towards a satisfactory year were widely available. The
Board was not persuaded that your FBI supervisors prevented
you from earning additional points. Moreover, you did not
perform any service or earn any points in excess of that
already reflected on your Retirement Credit Record. The
Board found that under these circumstances, making a change
to your Retirement Credit Record retroactive to 2004 and
Docket: 5488-10
2005 is inappropriate. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are
entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence
of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04954-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10404-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Under these circumstances, the Board found no error or injustice in your naval record and your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05488-09
“A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3‘June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05488-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00823-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice regarding constructive service for completion of a minority enlistment. In your case, your minority enlistment expired on 25 January 1970.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06784-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05585-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your Career Retirement Credit Report shows that as of 19 April 2007, you have completed 12 years of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04764-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that you have only been credited with 39...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08354-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04775-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your Career Retirement Credit Report shows that as of 3 April 2007, you have completed 11 years of...