DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON OC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 5187-09
9 April 2010
Thig is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
“The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 December
2007. On 20 December 2007 you were given diagnoses of an
adjustment disorder and alcohol abuse. On 13 February 2008 you
received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous
entry/alcohol abuse and were assigned a reentry code of RE~4,
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous entry
based on pre-service alcohol abuse. The Board concluded that
there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you
have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice
for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to
policy. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\) Da
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dirddtr
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04735-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 July 2006. A psychiatric evaluation conducted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09385-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07504-09
You requested correction of your record to show, in effect, that you did not suffer from a personality disorder and that you were assigned a more favorable reentry code than RE-4. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01932-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 18 April 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11929-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2010. Since you have been treated no aifferently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reentry code. Consequently.,, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04620-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 7 February 2007 at age 21. As a result, you were processed for an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06539-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05781-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09906-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08446-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code due to your alcohol dependence diagnosis.