DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100
SIN
Docket No: 05081-10
4 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 March 2010. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
1 July 2008. The Board found that the record reflects that on
15 December 2008, you were medically evaluated and diagnosed with
a personality disorder and an adjustment disorder. The report
stated, in part, that you manifested a disorder of character,
behavior and adaptability that was of such severity as to
preclude adequate military service. Further, although you were
not a risk for suicide or homicide, you could have become
dangerous to yourself of others if retained in the service.
Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated and
you were discharged with an entry level separation by reason of a
diagnosed personality disorder and adjustment disorder. At that
time, you were assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
The Board concluded that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are
separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder and adjustment
disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Boatd reconsider itS decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter gbt previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
recerd, the burden"is on the applicant to demonstrate the
exigStence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09815-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 was appropriate in your case in view of your disruptive behavior, sub-standard performance of duty, and failure to conform to Navy standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08012-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your narrative reason for separation or reentry code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reason for separation or RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07997-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08338-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned under your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01058-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that your reentry code was assigned in error, or that it is unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07125-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. , consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burdén is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02858-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10313-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice, Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10313-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 2002. On 29 July 2002 you underwent a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06145-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2012. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.