Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04606-10
Original file (04606-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TAL
Docket No: 4606-10
24 January 2011

This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ,
application on 20 January 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
22 February 1983, at age 19. On 18 July 1983, you received
nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for failure to go to your appointed
place of duty. On 22 February 1984, you received NJP for
unauthorized absence (UA} from your unit, and wrongful
appropriation. On 30 March 1986 you were convicted in civil
court by Onslow County District Court in Jacksonville, North
Carolina, of writing a worthless check in the amount of $10.75.
You were sentenced to pay all court costs and the amount of the
check. On 23 April 1986, you received NUP for wrongful use of
marijuana and insubordinate conduct toward a superior petty
officer. You were counseled on several occasions regarding your
misconduct and warned that further offenses could result in
administrative separation. You were notified of pending
administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable
discharge due to misconduct. After consulting with legal
counsel, you elected to present your case to an administrative
discharge board (ADB). On 22 July 1986, the ADB found that you
committed misconduct and recommended that you be separated with a
general discharge. On 5 August 1986, you were held by civil
authorities on a charge of arson in Onslow County jail in
Jacksonville, North Carolina, pending any civil action.

On 10 October 1986, you were returned to military control.

On 12 December 1986 the separation authority agreed with the
recommendation of the ADB and directed your commanding efficer to
issue you a general discharge by reason of misconduct, civil
conviction, and on 15 December 1986, you were so discharged.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
‘all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
éverall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that
resulted in three NJPs and two civil convictions. The Board also
believed that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge
since a separation under other than honorable conditions is often
directed when a Sailor is separated for misconduct. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

la-Ge!
W. DEAN SA
Executive Dikec

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04695-09

    Original file (04695-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03358-09

    Original file (03358-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01030

    Original file (MD04-01030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 980723: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Specifically, the applicant contends that his discharge was unjust “s ince my substantive and procedural due process rights were denied to me and my...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04071-11

    Original file (04071-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, members of the armed services who are convicted by civil authorities may be discharged for misconduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01092

    Original file (MD99-01092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01092 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990811, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. 880823: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civilian conviction as evidenced by conviction on 7 Jul 1987 in Onslow County, District Court, Jacksonville, North Carolina for indecent exposure. After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00701

    Original file (MD03-00701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. This action was the basis for his administrative separation due to the commission of a serious offense.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4993 13

    Original file (NR4993 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00649

    Original file (MD03-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service and reason for discharge was discovered by the NDRB. 911217: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division] directed the Applicant's discharge under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00508

    Original file (MD04-00508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00508 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040203. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. [On July 23 a warrant for your arrest on two cases of issuance of a worthless check, case numbers issued by the Onslow County Sherifffs Department are #02CR 055017 and #02CR 056426.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501310

    Original file (MD0501310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 910208: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to a civilian conviction, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.910604: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact. Relief denied.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...