Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03475-10
Original file (03475-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 03475-10
7 July 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

    

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref : {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 22 Mar 10 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 13 May 10

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the “not observed” enlisted performance
evaluation report for 19 January to 15 March 2006, a copy of which
is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride,

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 July
2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted
all administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner objects that block 20 (“Physical Readiness” )
of the contested report erroneously reflects “F [failed physical
readiness test]/WS [within weight/body fat standards]” when it
should show "N [not tested] /XX [impossible to weigh or measure] .”
e. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office having.
cognizance over the subject matter of this case commented to the
effect the request has merit and warrants partial relief,
specifically, changing the entry in block 20 of the report at issue
to “N/xXx." .

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
limited corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by modifying as
follows the enlisted performance evaluation report for 19 January
to 15 March 2006, dated 15 March 2006 and signed by Lieutenant

Commander Cas

Block 20: Change from “F/WS” to “N/XX.”

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

d. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review
and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

‘ a! L, Brann
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.
eS fo
P™ W. DEAN PFELFFER

Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03781-08

    Original file (03781-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and Dunn, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08556-10

    Original file (08556-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 31 March to 15 September 2007, a copy of which is at Tab A, by changing the entry in block 20 (“Physical Readiness”) from “P [passed physical readiness test (PRT) ]/NS [not within weight/body fat standards]” to “P/WS [within weight/body fat standards] .” 2. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03070-12

    Original file (03070-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2007 to 11 April 2008 by changing the entry in block 20 (“Physical Readiness”) from “P [passed physical readiness test] /NS [not within weight/body fat standards]” to “P/WS [within weight /body fat standards] .” 2. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09689-05

    Original file (09689-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having Based on reference (a) and the BRIMS database recommend the member’s evaluation should be revised to P/WS “Passed/Within Standards” in Block 20. The member alleges an administrative error occurred and requests the report be corrected and changed from ‘PINS’ to reflect a ‘P/WS’ in block 20, Physical Readiness.b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11416-08

    Original file (11416-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11416-08 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : ‘REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: © (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by revising the enlisted performance’ evaluation report for 21 August 2007 to 15 March 2008 (copy at “Tab A). That any material directed to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02493-05

    Original file (02493-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 October 2001 to 30 May 2002 and 1 November 2002 to 5 June 2003, copies of which are at Tabs A and B, respectively. Finally, she requested removal of any reference to her involuntary transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), her not being recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08885-07

    Original file (08885-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 29 July 2004 by changing the entry in block 20 ("Physical Readiness") from "P/NS" (passed physical readiness test (PRT) /not within height/weight/body fat standards) to "P/WS" (passed PRT/within height/weight/body...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06904-08

    Original file (06904-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Fales, J. Hicks and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 October 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01887-99

    Original file (01887-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommended modifying blocks 20 and 36 as Petitioner originally requested, on the basis that he had provided documentation indicating he should have been medically waived from the PRT, but they concluded he had not provided sufficient justification for changing his promotion recommendation. As Petitioner now requests removal of the recommendation, rather than modification, and the evidence does not show what the recommendation would have been if he had been waived from the PRT, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07350-10

    Original file (07350-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Chapman and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. Enclosure (4) is Petitioner’s response to enclosures (2) and (3), reiterating his request to remove the statement “Blk 36. Due to failure of BCA 2JUN07.” The Board finds Petitioner's request to have the...