DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TOR
Docket No: 3422-1
2 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions ef Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 February 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the correspondence from the Navy Personnel
Command (PERS-311) dated 4 June 2007, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you received an adverse performance
evaluation for the period from 16 June to 22 November 2006. In
this regard, you received a mark of “2.0" in the following
categories: Military Bearing/Character, Personal Job
Accomplishment /Initiative, and Teamwork; and a mark of “3.0” in
the category Command or Organizational Climate/Equal Opportunity.
At that time you were not recommended for advancement,
retention, or reenlistment. Shortly thereafter, on 22 February
2007, you were honorably discharged upon completion of your
required active service and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board concluded that your commanding officer's
nonrecommendation for reenlistment was appropriate and correctly
assigned based on your adverse performance evaluation. Further,
the Board concluded that there was no evidence in the record to
support a change of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Finally, the
Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
PERS-311 correspondence regarding your request to change block 20
of your evaluation report, and noted that you should also contact
BUPERS for any administrative changes and/or corrections to your
record. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. As stated above, you are
entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon
submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WQsawtu
W. DEAN PFE R
Executive or
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05966-06
A review of the member’s headquarters record revealed the report in question is not on file, however, a copy of the report is present in enclosure (1). We recommend the member’s reporting senior be required to correct the report by changing the promotion recommendation in block 45 to “Significant Problems” as required by reference (a), and the member should be required to sign the report and prepare a Statement to the Record if he so desires. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY PERSONNEL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07367-06
The Board also considered your letter dated 16 January 2007.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, the member’s record was reviewed and he was selected for promotion to the grade of Lieutenant Commander, with this report in his record. h. If directed by the Board for Correction of Naval Records, PERS-3 11 will accept a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08296-07
Additionally, the member requests the fitness reports be replaced with the correct original report. f. The reporting senior has submitted, and we have accepted a supplement fitness report for entry in member’s OMPF and it has been posted to member’s PSR.g. We recommend no further action be taken by the Board for Corrections of Naval Records as the member’s record has already been corrected administratively.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08030-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 October 2001 at age 20. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09261-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 3 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The fitness report in block 29, does not include time served as a Sales Officer, enclosure (1) has appointment letter as a Helicopter Control officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07450-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. You were honorably released from active duty, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07858-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Administrative changes correct the administrative blocks of the fitness or evaluation report. We recommend no further action be taken by the Board for Corrections of Naval Records as the member’s record has already been corrected administratively.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00289-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS-311) dated 2 February 2009 with attachment (e-mail regarding the PERS-311 contact with the reporting senior), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09104-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of the adverse discharge evaluation which recommended that you not be allowed to reenlist. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08049-08
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS - 311) dated 30 September 2008, with e-mail regarding PERS-311 contact with the reporting senior, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member’s statement and the reporting senior’s endorsement to the fitness report are...