DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 3265-10
6 July 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552. .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 June 2010. ‘Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 November 2007
without disclosing a prior civilian arrest for sexual imposition.
On 31 July 2009, you were honorably discharged by reason of
erroneous entry and assigned a reentry code of RE-3E.
A reentry code of RE-3E is the most favorable code authorized by
regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to erroneous
entry. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
Concerning your request to waive the debt you currently have with
the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), the Board is
unable to take action since you have provided no evidence to show
that you have exhausted your administrative remedies by filing an
appeal with DFAS and being denied relief. Accordingly, until you
have exhausted this administrative Semecy no further action can
be taken on this issue.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Boar@ reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequentiy, when appiving for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN oh I
Executive Di r
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02948-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00444-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. This condition existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11496-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0732 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 6 March 2013, you were diagnosed with hepatitis B which existed prior to your enlistment and recommended for administrative separation. The Board noted that an RE-3E is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10443-08
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or “yy, injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00601-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘ Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4531 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in “support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09855-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8955-10 27 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Lo; Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER GS NAVAL RECORD REVIEW OF —— Seen Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was assigned on 18...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04521-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2011. You are advised that an RE-3E reentry code is the most favorable code you could have been assigned and may be waived by prior service recruiting personnel. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4120 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...