DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2961-10
26 March 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: FORMER «ME i) REVIEW CE
NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code he was assigned on 24 May 2006.
+...
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.
Win, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 24 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enciosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 6 March 2006. On 5
May 2006 he was diagnosed with an excessive hearing loss, which
existed prior to his enlistment. On 24 May 2006, he received an
uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of his failure
to meet medical/physical procurement standards and was assigned a
reentry code of RE-4. ,
c. Applicable directives require the assignment of an RE-4
reentry code when a Sailor is discharged for failing to meet
medical/physical procurement standards. A Sailor who is found to
be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the
alternative, be separated by reason of erroneous entry and
assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that the reason for discharge should
be changed to erroneous entry since Petitioner was unaware of his
condition when he was accepted for enlistment. Accordingly, the
Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be
changed to erroneous entry.
The Board also concludes that an RE-3E reentry code should be
assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had any
performance or disciplinary infractions during his pericd of
service and his record does not otherwise support the more
stigmatizing code of RE-4,
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on
24 May 2006 he received an entry level separation by reason of
erroneous entry and was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JAMES Ez ICIOS
Recorder cting Recorder
2. Pursuant to the delegation offauthority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e})
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a}, has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01260-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1260-09 24 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER i REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 3 November 2006. ni: and Mr. a Me reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04373-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 10 October 2006. The Board, consisting of Messrs@ a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6-May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05569-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX “5100 WASHINGTON DC 20370 ORS Docket No: 5569-09 & June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF Subj: FORMER 4 NAVAL REC Ref: (a) Title 10 U:S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12756-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was assigned on 17 November 1994. oA Pee, and , reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 4 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03974-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 27 December 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Sa ‘ Paeee and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegatiéms of error and injustice on 3 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09343-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 16 June 2009. 2 a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11724-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 1 September 2009. A Sailor who is found to pe not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative, pe separated by reason of erroneous entry and assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be changed to erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12845-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 5 November 2007. ql, «and Ms. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 5 November 2007 he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06549-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 6549-09 27 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD a, a a Ct
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05625-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 24 August 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Silberman, Bourgeois, and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the - available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval...