DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Lee
Docket No. 1813-10
5 Apr 11
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tor Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref: (a) Title TO U.S.C. LS52
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 of 19 Nov 10
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show the Petitioner was not discharged on 9 December 2005.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Z4salman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
21 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 1813-10
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. Petitioner's discharge of 9 December 2005 is null and void.
b. Petitioner's enlistment was extended for a period of one
month giving him a date of separation of “9 January 2006" vice
“9 December 2005”.
ec. On 1 January 2006 Petitioner was transferred to the Retired
Reserve List (Awaiting Pay at Age 60) in pay grade E-7 with 20 years
of qualifying non-regular service as computed under Title 10 USC
Chapter 1223.
d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
5 April 2011 \o Doar %
W. DEAN PFEIL
Executive Di t
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7775 13
He was then selected by the FY 2012 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, convened on 17 April 2012, and he was promoted to gunnery sergeant with a date of rank and effective date of 1 December 2012. d. Enclosure (4) shows that the in zone percentage selected for the FY 2006 Staff Sergeant Selection Board was 62.2. e. Enclosure (5) reflects that the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removing Petitioner's fitness report for 1 April to 2 November 2006, which documented the later...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03607-06
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 14 December 2005 is for a term of 4 years, vice 6 years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07567-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by amending his original appointment as a lieutenant commander (pay grade 0-4), Medical Corps (MC), U. S. Navy (USN) to change the grade to commander (pay grade 0-5) and the date of rank from 5 August 2000 to 9 December 2005, leaving unchanged the acceptance date of 9 December 2005; and that his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01309-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IS(3912) rating/NEC. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09253-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he accepted his original appointment as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 2 September 2005, vice 2 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Hess and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03972-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he accepted his commission as a lieutenant in the Navy Reserve on 2 September 2008, father than 1 April 2010, and that the lieutenant date of rank reflected on his commission was 1 June 2006, rather than 20 December 2007. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Chapman...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03401-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of full separation pay when he was discharged from active duty effective 14 December 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04559-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Novello, and Ms. Mann reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10687-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled to separation pay, was retired by reason of physical disability, and is not required to repay the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus. On 21 December 2005, Petitioner was advised that he could be subject to administrative separation action unless he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09408-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5400 Lec Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the...