Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01374-10
Original file (01374-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC: 20370-5100

TAL
Docket No: 1374-10

10 November 2010

 

nee

This is in reference to for correction of your
naval record pursuant f title 10 of the United

States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

application on 3 November 2010. Your allegations of error and
dance with administrative

injustice were reviewed in accor
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of

your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,

and policies.

cientious consideration of the entire
d the evidence submitted was insufficient

e of probable material error or

after careful and cons
record, the Board foun
to establish the existenc
injustice.
nlisted in the Marine Corps and began 4 period of active
duty on 17 July 1991 at age 18. You received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) on three occasions for two instances of
unauthorized absence (UA) from your unit that totaled 29 days,
missing movement, preaking restriction and two instances of
ounseled regarding your

wrongful use of marijuana. You were ©
misconduct and warned that further offenses could result in
e notified of

administrative separation. On g woril 1894, you wer
pending administrative discharge processing with an other than
honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). You
waived all of your procedural rights, including your right to an
administrative discharge board (ADB). On 11 April 1994, the
separation authority directed an OTH discharge by reason or
misconduct (drug abuse). On 15 April 1994 you Were sO

discharged.

lication, carefully weighed
such as your youth and

the Board concluded

b recharacterization
our misconduct that

in its review of your app

all potentially mitigating factors,
overall record of service. Nevertheless,
these factors were not sufficient to warran

of your discharge given the seriousness of y

The Board,
resulted in three NUPs. Finally, the Board found that you waived
the right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a
better characterization of service. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members

of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider:its decision upon submission of new and material
#evidence or other-matter not previously considered by the Board.
q 75. bole regard, it.is important to keep in mind that a
@ presumption ‘of regflarity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval
*#ecord, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or inpjuptice .

Sincerely,

LoSracd

W. DEAN PF B

 

Executive Diveetor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12215-09

    Original file (12215-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You waived all of your procedural rights, including your right to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11272-09

    Original file (11272-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13156-09

    Original file (13156-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11341-09

    Original file (11341-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. On 20 December 1993, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07427-09

    Original file (07427-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05981-09

    Original file (05981-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 August 1987, you received NIP for absence from your appointed place of duty.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00828-10

    Original file (00828-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10658-09

    Original file (10658-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12282-09

    Original file (12282-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08937-09

    Original file (08937-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010- Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...