DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BJG
Docket No: 1256-10
15 October 2010
J »
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 October 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. You affiliated with the Marine Corps
Reserve on 16 January 1957. You served about 41 days of
active duty and earned 88 inactive duty points, and then you
were honorably discharged on 15 January 1963 at the end of your
obligated service. You were not issued a Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active duty (DD Form 214) because you
did not serve a minimum of 90 days on active duty. You are
advised that an individual is only entitled to veterans’
benefits after serving a minimum of 180 days on active duty.
Regarding your allegation that you had six months of active
duty at Quantico, Virginia, your record reflects no evidence of
this, and you have provided nothing to support your allegation.
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
“thet a presumption offftegularity attaches to all official
»xeCords. Consequently, wheh applying for a correction of an
‘ official naval Yecord, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
e
F
W. DEAN PF!
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00750-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00747-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13273-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2010. Accordingly, and as you have not demonstrated that the condition of your feet condition was ratable at or above 30% disabling at the time of your discharge, which is the minimum rating required to entitle you to monthly disability retirement payments from the Marine Corps, there is no basis for recommending any corrective action in your case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07677-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08585-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The fact that your service was characterized as honorable in 1982 when you were released from active duty did not mandate that you be awarded an honorable discharge at the expiration of your enlistment in 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10719-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2010. As the statements you submitted in support of your application are insufficient to demonstrate that you were unfit for duty by reason of a disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00180-10
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing from section I (reporting senior (RS)’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “{You have] the potential to be a well rounded SNCO [staff noncommissioned officer] .” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 19 January 2010 with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01402-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00150-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, record of service and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06432-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...