DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX .
. JR]
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Docket No. 00402-10
22 October 2010
CI
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21
October 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the
Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that
it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. The Board noted that
you knew on the date of your discharge that you were not being
separated or retired by reason of physical disability. In addition,
the Board noted that you failed to submit any evidence that is
probative of your contention to the effect that on 13 April 1983,
you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability due to
posttraumatic stress disorder.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely;
W. DEAN PF]
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05646-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07326-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. You underwent a pre-separation physical examination on 29 March 2005 and were found physically qualified for separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07646-10
The Board may deny an application in executive session if it determines that the evidence of record fails to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If the petitioner’s fitness is considered questionable by the Board or the author(s) of the medical advisory opinion, the Board or its staff will in most cases seek an advisory opinion from the Director, SECNAVCORB, on the issue of the petitioner’s fitness for duty at the time of his separation or release from active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04112-10
As your request for upgrade of your bad conduct discharge was denied by the Board on 22 October 1997, and you have not submitted any new material evidence of error or injustice in connection with that discharge, the Board limited its review to your request for correction of your record to show that you were separated or retired by reason of physical disability. You were separated from the Navy on 5 June 1981 with a bad conduct discharge upon the completion of the appellate review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00290-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were not physically qualified for release from active duty on 2 October 2008, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 27 May 2009, when you were discharged by reason of physical fitness assessment failure, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07776-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00247-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00529-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02636-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (SECNAVCORB) dated 1 July 2009 and 6 January 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12930-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...