Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13337-09
Original file (13337-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 13337-09
8 Mar 10

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enci: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2} CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 26 Feb 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1l,

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March
2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
Warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds

the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 13337-09
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He was enlisted in paygrade E-~3, vice E-1, effective 17
December 2008 (Active Duty Service Date}. Patitioner met the
requirements for advanced paygrade based on DEP referrals. (NOTE: The
change in the effective date of advancement to E-3 may also impact on
Petitioner's E-4 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was eligible
for the E-4 examination but did not take it because the above change
had not been made, the following procedures will apply. Petitioner
should take the next available E-4 advancement examination and compare
the Final Multiple Score (FMS) received on that examination with the
FMS that was required for the "missed" examination. If the score
received meets or exceeds the score that was previously required for
advancement Petitioner may reapply to the Board for consideration of
advancement to H-4 retroactive to the date he would have been advanced
on the "missed" examination cycle. A command
endorsement /recommendation, a DD Form 149, and a copy of this letter
must be included. The Board will determine whether the request will
be approved.)

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the

Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 4ASALMAN nad eee J. HES
Recorder Acting Hecordex
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

8 March 2010

FAW. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09916-09

    Original file (09916-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1l. c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07929-09

    Original file (07929-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07929-09

    Original file (07929-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12339-09

    Original file (12339-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10164-09

    Original file (10164-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12144-09

    Original file (12144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2010...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11477-09

    Original file (11477-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10635-09

    Original file (10635-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07856-09

    Original file (07856-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sep 09 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07144-09

    Original file (07144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner signed and executed DD Form 4/3 acknowledging he was voluntarily enlisting in paygrade E-1, but now alleges he should have been enlisted in paygrade E-3 based on college credits earned prior to his enlistment. g. On 24 November 2008 Petitioner signed an “Advanced Paygrade Enlistment Statement of Understanding” indicating he was NOT eligible for Advanced Paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...