Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13205-09
Original file (13205-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 13205-09
9 March 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ii ay
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2} NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/042 of 19 Jan 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner was advanced to E3 on 30 April 2009, and later
reduced in rank on 29 July 2009, from E3 to E2 due to a nonjudicial
punishment.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
Decket No. 13205-09
existence of an injustice waxranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E3 on 30 April 2009, and later
reduced in rank from E3 to E2 on 29 July 2009, due to a nonjudicial
punishment . '

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6{(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c})) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. ond

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.
\
8 March 2010 \p\ ons

W. DEAN PPRI
Executive Ditracter

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02690-02

    Original file (02690-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E2 based on the completion of 23.5 semester credit hours (45 needed for paygrade E3). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mimer, Pauling, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03029-02

    Original file (03029-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP: ddj Docket No: 3029-02 16 April 2002 Froni: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10

    Original file (00082-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07372-98

    Original file (07372-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 JLP:jlp Docket No: 7372-98 25 March 1999 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW CjlF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board &questing, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02370-03

    Original file (02370-03.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01350-99

    Original file (01350-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: tj Docket No: 1350-99 24 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to paygrade E2 based on the referral of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10825-09

    Original file (10825-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MT2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 28 10_56_09 CDT 2000

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:tj Docket No: 8671-98 22 June 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: J11IL~ REVIEWOF NAVAL REC~D Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02462-99

    Original file (02462-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advance~nent to paygrade E2, on the date she commenced active duty, based on the completion of the required number of college credit hours.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalnian, Cali, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 08 June 1999 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07753-09

    Original file (07753-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Board finds _ the existence of an injustice warranting the following...