DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 REC
Docket No: 11646-09
6 August 2010
for correction of your
This is in reference to your application
naval record pursuant to the provisions of tibie 20,
States Code, Section L552.
1 of the Board for Correction of Naval
ession, considered your
Your allegations of error and
A threé-méember pane
Records, sitting in executive s
application on 4 August 2010.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
icable to the proceedings of this
regulations and procedures appli
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
on 16 July 1943, at age 20. On
You enlisted in the Navy
ion was conducted and Le
3 September 1943, a psychiatric evaluat
was determined that you were immature, found to be unsuitable for
military training and it was recommended that you be separated.
You were afforded all of your procedural rights including the
opportunity to submit a statement on your behalf, which you
declined. On 9 September 1943, you were given an indifferent
discharge by reason of unsuitability. At the time of your
discharge, an RE-4 reenlistment code was assigned.
ew of your entire record and app
y mitigating factors, such as
found that these factors were not
in your characterization of
unsuitability for military
plication has been denied. The
f the panel will be furnished
The Board, in its revi
carefully weighed all potentiall
your youth. However, the Board
service given the diagnosis of
service. Accordingly, your 4p
names and votes of the members oO
upon request.
r case are such that
titled to have the
ew and material
t the circumstances of you
ot be taken. You are en
decision upon submission of n
It is regretted tha
Favorable action cann
Board reconsider its
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
los
W. DEAN
Executive D Oo
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01324-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02177-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, togethér with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 August 1974, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of unsuitability.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11485 14
NGTON, VA 22204-2490 your application o the provisions Cc o A three-member panel Records, sitting ine L e application on 16 December 20 members of the panel will Your allegations of error and in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings material considered by the Bo 1 S together with all material su naval record, and applicable ne ae tue a a qa He wage ? we Wat — Wa eoe ame Se LY st te QO SG oO i e in eA} On b- p- a] pe tO Oo 3 Qa OQ RE oom o wy i) 3 -Orcda = Mm mn...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01579-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00427-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2012. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8167 14
Documentary material considered py the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB}) , dared 3 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05670-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application.on 15 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03923-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01423-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03745-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change in...