Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11623-09
Original file (11623-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

REC
Docket No: 11623-09
6 August 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

subj __———w RECORD {i

Ref: (a) 10 U.8.0. 1582

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a),
Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States
Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the characterization of his
general discharge of 28 April 1971 be changed.

>. The Board, consisting of Mr. = Mr’. > and
Mr. banc reviewed Petitioner's allegations of r and
injustice on 4 August 2010 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence
of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted
all administrative remedies available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed
in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to
waive the statute of limitations and review the application
on its merits.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 June
1970, at the age of 18. However, during the course of his
military training, it was determined that he did not meet
the physical standards by reason of being underweight and
was processed for a physical disability without severance
pay discharge and received a general characterization.
While in school, he had a 21 day period of unauthorized
absence (UA). However, no punishment is in his record.

d. Under current standards, and those prevailing at the
time of Petitioner’s discharge, this type of separation
required that the character of service be based upon the
member's military record. However, due to the fact that he

was still undergoing recruit training, he received no
marks.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of
record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request
warrants favorable action. The Board notes his honorable
intentions and patriotism to his country. Accordingly, the
Board concludes that, as a matter of equity, relief in the
form of an honorable discharge is appropriate.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show
that he was honorably discharged on 28 April 1971 vice
receiving a general characterization of service the same

day.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected,
removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner's record
and that no such entries or material be added to the record

in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board,
together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for
retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of

Petitioner's naval record.
d. That the Department of Veterans Affairs be notified
that Petitioner applied to this Board on 24 October 2009.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that
a quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above
entitled matter.

Boson )) Aamge

 

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J.~ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in

Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation,
Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its
provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the

Secretary of the Navy.
\s |

W. DEAN F
By directio

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03161-09

    Original file (03161-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member°of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge on 24, March 1972 be changed. On 21 March 1972 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0685 14

    Original file (NR0685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his characterization of service (general) be upgraded to honorable, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be upgraded, and the removal of six page 11’s (Administrative - Remarks NAMVC 118(11)) from his record. He received six page 11 counseling entries in light’ of his SCM conviction in which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05066-11

    Original file (05066-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) regarding a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) dated 2 September 2010 and to be reinstated to paygrade E-5. The ADB found that the government had failed to prove wrongful use of a controlled substance and recommended retention. f. An advisory opinion (AO) from the Military Law...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02904-11

    Original file (02904-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected by removing an Administrative Remarks page 11 counseling entry dated 22 April 2010 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill, Mr. Bourgeois, and Ms. Siler, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2012 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1942-13

    Original file (NR1942-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 1 April 2010 from his official military personnel file (OMPF). e. An advisory opinion received from the Marine Corps regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NUP and page 11 entries recommended relief. That any...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12589-09

    Original file (12589-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. In an advisory opinion dated 8 January 2010 from the Headquarters Marine Corps Military Law Branch, it was recommended that Petitioner’s request for removal of the derogatory material referencing the NJP be granted because it had been set aside. f. An advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Enlisted Promotion Section dated 9 March 2010 noted that the NUP had been set aside, but recommended that Petitioner’s request for reinstatement and removal of his revocation of selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12631-11

    Original file (12631-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 12631-11 8 May 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD > pene Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all adverse material from his Official Military...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00690-10

    Original file (00690-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that dates of Time Lost on his DD-214 be corrected from 60 to 56 days. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures (1) through (3), an advisory opinion, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. e. The Board requested an advisory opinion in this case from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02632-10

    Original file (02632-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data to raise the “proficiency/conduct” marks of 1.9/1.5" for 31 July 2009 to at least %4.0/4.0." By the e-mail at enclosure {1), Petitioner amended his application to clarify he would be satisfied with removing the contested marks, if...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08450-09

    Original file (08450-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It provides Navy and Marine Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Accordingly, the Board concludes that, as a matter of equity, partial relief in the form of issuing him a general discharge is appropriate.