DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 11621-09
28 September 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 August 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
‘snsufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 28 December 1971 and served on active
duty until 23 February 1972 when you were honorably discharged by
reason of unsuitability.
The Board did not accept your contention that you enlisted on 5
November 1971 rather than 28 December 1971. Enclosed is a copy
of your enlistment contract, which you signed on 28 December
O71.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Wn
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di
“ae
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06924-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. The Department of Veterans affairs (VA) has rated your condition of “inflammatory bowel disease, probably ulcerative colitis” at various times at 10 and 30%, as the severity of your condition waxes and wanes. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10966-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Your case was forwarded and it was directed that you be separated by reason of unsuitability with a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02936-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2009. On 16 October 1974, you requested to be voluntarily discharged from the Marine Corps for the good of the service, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11610-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04697-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02103-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to zero in favor of an under other than honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00019-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 14 May 1974, you were returned to military authority by the Allegheny County Jail, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05561-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. your allegations of error and injustice .were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your request for discharge was granted and on 26 March 1971, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06848-09
“BR three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. On 28 September 1971 you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of larceny of $80, the property of another Marine. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06848-09
“BR three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. On 28 September 1971 you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of larceny of $80, the property of another Marine. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.