Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11617-09
Original file (11617-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100

 

REC: tir
Docket No: 11617-09
8 March 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 March 2010. The names and votes of the

members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 30 January 2007 at age 21 and served
without disciplinary incident.

Your record reflects that during your enlistment processing you
disclosed a pre-existing diagnosis of post gastrectomy/dumping
syndrome. It was determined that this condition negatively
impacted your performance of duty and affected your ability to
function effectively. As such, you were recommended for an
expeditious administrative separation.

As a result of the foregoing, you were notified of administrative
separation by reason of convenience of the government due to a
pre-existing medical condition as evidenced by your diagnosed
post gastrectomy/dumping syndrome. At that time you did not
object to the separation and waived your rights to submit a
separation rebuttal statement. Subsequently, your commanding
officer recommended discharge by reason of convenience of the
government due to a pre-existing medical condition as evidenced
by your diagnosed post gastrectomy/dumping syndrome, and further
noted that you were not recommended for retention or
reenlistment. The discharge authority approved this
recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you
a general discharge by reason of convenience of the government
due to a condition, not a disability. On 7 September 2007 you
were so discharged and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

In May 2009 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB} upgraded the
characterization of your service to fully honorable. However,
the narrative reason for separation was not changed.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and desire to change your reenlistment code. It also
considered the NDRB proceedings regarding the characterization of
your service. It further considered your assertion that your RE
code should be changed because you told the truth and should not
be denied the opportunity to reenlist. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change
in your reenlistment code because of your pre-existing diagnosed
post gastrectomy/dumping syndrome. Further, the Board concluded
that your diagnosed syndrome and nonrecommendation for retention
or reenlistment were sufficient to support the assignment of an
RE-4 reenlistment code, which is authorized by regulatory
guidance. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the

Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

W. DEAN P
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900751

    Original file (ND0900751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0017 14

    Original file (NR0017 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Bianchi and Messrs. Dixit and Gattis, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 April 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was recommended for administrative separation due to his diagnosed condition. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by changing his RE-4 reentry code, which was issued on 21 September 2007, to RE-36G, b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05014-02

    Original file (05014-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted Board. Based on these findings and your and a personality disorder with Additionally, you revealed The On 6 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08

    Original file (11385-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03657-09

    Original file (03657-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material together with all material submitted in naval record, of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and applicable to the proceedings of considered by the Board consisted of your application, procedures this Documentary support thereof, your and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed your commanding officer to issue you a general discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to unsuitability as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11326-07

    Original file (11326-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 11326-07 14 November 2008 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07460-09

    Original file (07460-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. The discharge authority directed your commanding officer to discharge you under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02003-08

    Original file (02003-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00509

    Original file (MD04-00509.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.010402: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation.010402: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...