Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11535-09
Original file (11535-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd

Docket No. 11535-09
16 July 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

You requested that your Physical Readiness Information
Management System data be corrected by entering “Dep/Op”
(deployment /operation) for Cycles 1 and 2 2006, Cycle 1 2007,
Cycles 1 and 2 2008 and Cycle 1 2009.

It is noted that the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
(OPNAV N135) has made the requested correction for Cycle 1 2009.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 July 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by OPNAV N135 dated 1 December 2009 with
attachment, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Wgesehed

Executive \Dixéctor

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02834-09

    Original file (02834-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations — dated 19 May 2009 with attachment, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05000-11

    Original file (05000-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07718-10

    Original file (07718-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03038-09

    Original file (03038-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 28 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, dated 20 May. 2009 with attachment and 19 August 2009, and the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 June 2009, copies of which are attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10923-09

    Original file (10923-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OPNAV N135 dated 1 December 2009 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probabie material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04782-08

    Original file (04782-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend no correction be made to the requested PRIMS record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09425-07

    Original file (09425-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00668-08

    Original file (00668-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, Enclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 05 Mar 08 From: Ms. Heather L. Pouncey, Physical Readiness Program Manager (OPNAV N135) To: Heather Topping, Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File 00668-08 Encl: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official data) 1. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08550-07

    Original file (08550-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 13Nov07MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OFRef(a) BCNR Case File 08550-07(b) OPNAVJNST 6110.1 HEnd: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official Data)1. Service member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in the sailor’s Physical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03107-08

    Original file (03107-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2008. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove injustices in his Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS) record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.