Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09349-09
Original file (09349-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS —
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

RDZ:.ecb
Docket No. 09349-09
25 February 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF FORMER ay

Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

 

 

Enel: (1) Subject's naval record

1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner,

applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded
to honorable.

 

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George and
Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 24 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner's application to the Board was filed ina
timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 14 November 2000.
Between November 2000 and July 2003 he received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) on three occasions. The first NJP took place
on 31 January 2001 for failure to obey an order. Petitioner's
second NJP was based on his being absent from his duty station
for eight hours in the early morning hours of New Years Eve of
2002 and being intoxicated. His third NUP occurred on 26 June
2003 and was due to Petitioner’s again being absent from his
duty station for four hours and being intoxicated. Based on
these three NUP’s he was issued an other than honorable
discharge on 11 July 2003.

qd. In his application to the Board Petitioner has submitted
documentation showing that after his discharge he successfully
completed an alcohol rehabilitation program and is presently
taking courses at Alabama State University with a view to
earning an undergraduate degree in psychology.

F

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's case warrants partial relief
by upgrading his other than honorable discharge to general based
on the minor nature of his offenses and his post service
accomplishments. Nevertheless due to his frequent misconduct
and substandard performance of duty his request for an honorable
discharge cannot be justified.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand the reasons for the Board's action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on
11 July 2003 he received a general discharge in lieu of the
other than honorable discharge actually issued on that date.

b. That Petitioner’s request for an honorable discharge be
denied.

ec. That upon request, the Department of Veterans' Affairs be
informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board
on 25 September 2008.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

¢

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRIAN | GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)), and
having ensured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
provisions of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

FAW. DEAN EIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04949-08

    Original file (04949-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service vice the general characterization of service that he received on 20 July 1964, when he was released from active duty. On 5 February 1963, he departed Quantico and at that time his proficiency and conduct mark averages were both 4.1. d. On 22 April 1963, Petitioner reported to Okinawa, Japan, for duty as a weapons...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11205-10

    Original file (11205-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . c. Petitioner received NUP on 28 December 2007 for improper use of a government vehicle and was awarded a letter of reprimand. Further, that he was the command sergeant major at the time Petitioner received NJP on 28 December 2007 and the only document he provided was the counseling form page 11.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00516-10

    Original file (00516-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    30 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF ° Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the removal of all references to a nonjudicial punishment (NJP), held on 27 March 2009, from his naval record and removal of a promotion restriction dated 12 June 2009, from the’ Marine Corps Total Force System...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12321-08

    Original file (12321-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 that was issued on 18 November 2007, when he was honorably released from active duty. d. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, which states, in part, as follows: ... [Petitioner's] service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that at the time of separation he was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13634-10

    Original file (13634-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    13634-10 21 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Der Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ec enl/ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs Exnicios, George and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03552-09

    Original file (03552-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 03552-09 8 March 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: NAVAL RECORD OF

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12589-09

    Original file (12589-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. In an advisory opinion dated 8 January 2010 from the Headquarters Marine Corps Military Law Branch, it was recommended that Petitioner’s request for removal of the derogatory material referencing the NJP be granted because it had been set aside. f. An advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Enlisted Promotion Section dated 9 March 2010 noted that the NUP had been set aside, but recommended that Petitioner’s request for reinstatement and removal of his revocation of selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9167 13

    Original file (NR9167 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, issued on 6 July 2006, be changed. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Petitioner entered the Marine Corps on 22 June 1998. The Board concludes that based upon him being...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08623-09

    Original file (08623-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    08623-09 28 May 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records | To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD or @ Ref: (a} 10 U.S.c, 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject’s naval record 1. Ms. ees: renee reviewed Petitioner’s allegations Of error an 010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he received a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07770-10

    Original file (07770-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 RDZ:ech Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs Grover, Neuschafer and Ms. Aldrich, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. Based on Petitioner's NUP and continuing financial problems he was administratively...