DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION. OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON Dc 20370-5100
TAL
Docket No: 8839-09
11 June 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 June 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable atatutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and consclentious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
15 August 1991 at age 18. You received nonjudicial punishment on
three occasions for two instances of underage drinking, being
incapacitated for duty, unauthorized absence (UA) from your unit,
missing ship’s movement, and drunk and disorderly conduct. You
were counseled on two occasions regarding your misconduct and.
warned that further offenses could result in administrative
separation. On 18 November 1993, you were notified of pending
administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable
(OTH) discharge due to misconduct. You waived all of your
procedural rights, including your right to an administrative
discharge board (ADB). The separation authority directed an OTH
discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct,
and on 15 December 1993, you were SO discharged.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant yecharacterization
of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct.
Additionally, the Board noted that you waived the right to an
ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of service. Finally, no discharge is upgraded
merely because of the passage of time. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
la |
W. DEAN P
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11955-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2010. On 16 July 1993, you received an OTH discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00086-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the characterization of your discharge, given your record of two NUIP's, and conviction by a SCM of misconduct. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an individual is discharged for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08836-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11145-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04080-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2012. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03551-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6229 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. You waived all of your procedural rights, including your right to an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 24 May 1993, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct (drug use).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8929 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06282-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The separation authority directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02957-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...