Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08379-09
Original file (08379-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

SOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 8379+09
29 December 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 December 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicabie to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all ‘material submitted in support

thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was

insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served in the Navy from 9 August 1994 to
13 December 1994, when you received an uncharacterized entry
level separation by reason of a personality disorder and were
assigned a reentry code of RE-4.

Bn RE-4 reentry code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is
often assigned to individuals separated by reason of a
personality disorder. As you did not establish that you were
misdiagnosed as suffering from a personality disorder and
therefore discharged in error, or that your reentry code is
otherwise erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend
corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Spa

W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Di xr

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11771-09

    Original file (11771-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your *— application on 15 October 2009. On 3 October 1994, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04582-08

    Original file (04582-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Furthermore, regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09680-08

    Original file (09680-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that your reentry code was assigned in error, or that it is unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05148-02

    Original file (05148-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1994 you were diagnosed On 29 On 5 January 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10075-08

    Original file (10075-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01947-09

    Original file (01947-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to individuals separated due to personality disorders, especially if they are deemed to constitute a threat to themselves or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09368-09

    Original file (09368-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR06008 13

    Original file (NR06008 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. However, the Board concluded that you were assigned the correct narrative reason for separation and reentry code in light of your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6008 13

    Original file (NR6008 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. However, the Board concluded that you were assigned the correct narrative reason for separation and reentry code in light of your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01058-09

    Original file (01058-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that your reentry code was assigned in error, or that it is unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...