DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Decket No. 07648-09
29 April 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested, in effect,
that the Physical Readiness Information Management System -
(PRIMS) data for the Cycle 2 (Fall) 2005 Body Composition
Assessment (BCA) be changed from 23 percent (not within
standards) to medically waived.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 April 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
dated 19 August 2009, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence. of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board. substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN Ss /
Executive D r
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07477-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07736-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 August 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11517-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 Aprii 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with alli material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02301-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07632-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 17 August 2009 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached, and your fax dated 28 September 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01239-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 22 March 2010, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 9 April 2010 with enclosures. _ Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07522-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 August 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04871-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12603-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting-in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06750-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2011. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 20 September, 29 October and 29 December 2010, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.