Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04681-09
Original file (04681-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700

 

MEH
Docket No. 4681-09
29 Jun 09

 

Dear

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June
2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D/09U00462 of 1
Jun 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
che Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

LoDeak

W. DEAN PFETBS
Executive Dipect

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

 

1160
Ser N130D/09U0462
01 June 2009

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS

Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION ICO aR

Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 1160.9
(b) GENADMIN DTG 171200Z MAR 07

Encl: {1) BCNR Case No. 04505-09

1. The attached case of QQQBBINMMP Case No. 04681-09 at
enclosure (1), has been reviewed. N130D recommends disapproval
of petitioner’s request to include an Enlistment Bonus (EB) to
his latest enlistment contract.

2. As stated in paragraph 10.a.3. of reference (a), “Once
training has started a change in rating, skill, or program will
normally terminate a member’s eligibility for any ER categorized
under paragraph 9a.” An exception to that policy was in place
during Qqqqreclassification. Per reference (b), a |
SEAL attrite “may be offered one reclassification for EB if they
reclassify into one of the following ratings: SB-ATF, EOD-ATF,
ND-ATF, or AIRCREW-RESCUE (AIRR).”

3. SMI did not reclassify into one of the ratings
listed under the exceptions and was therefore not authorized an
EB per policy.

4. FT am the PoC for this case. Contact me at comm. 703-614-2067
or by email: derek.vestal@navy.mil for instructions.

D. A. VESTAL
Navy Bonus Programs
OPNAV N1I30D

lor Official Use Orly — Privacy Sensitive —Any misuse or itnauthorized disclosure may result in boil civil and criminal
penalties,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04505-09

    Original file (04505-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. of reference (a), “Once training has started a change in rating, skill, or program will normally terminate a member’s eligibility for any EB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11913-08

    Original file (11913-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner is requesting to not be paid her $1,000.00 Enlistment Bonus Source Rate (EBSR} and the $5,000.00 Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) and cancel her 12 month agreement to extend.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07387-09

    Original file (07387-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PPRTRP Executive Dinac Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09270-07

    Original file (09270-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D2/08U0282 of 29 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06846-11

    Original file (06846-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR} . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07028-09

    Original file (07028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, » sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. declination of the Enlistment Bonus (EB) be recinded and he be_ allowed to receive an EB for his rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00182-11

    Original file (00182-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01420-11

    Original file (01420-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06078-08

    Original file (06078-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11903-09

    Original file (11903-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR), and Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and...