DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SION
Docket No: 04284-0909
29 March 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval.record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period.of active duty on
19 January 1988 at age 20. On 21 May 1988, you were honorably
released from initial active duty for training (IADT) and ordered
to report to your reserve unit. Based on the information
currently contained in your record it appears you were not
actively participating and drilling with your reserve unit as you
were required to do. Based on your non-participation in drills,
administrative discharge action was initiated and on 31 May 1991,
the separation authority directed an other than honorable
discharge. On 6 June 1991 you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, record of service, and the reason you state that
prevented you from actively drilling. Nevertheless, the Board
found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge given your failure to drill
with your reserve unit. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ww. “DEAN PF Rr
Executive tor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06069-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 3 November 1988. After review by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08558-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. “Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08064-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08118-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. _On 9 May 1987, you were counseled and warned that further missed drills could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08355-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, :considered your application on 9 December 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11146-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02589-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01499-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 1499-078 January 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the UnitedStates Code section 1552.A three-memberpanel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Records, sitting in executive session, Considered your application on 28 November 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10884-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Per Navy regulations, and once you receive your discharge this ID card is required to be returned to your command.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10383-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered: your application on 14 April 2010. On 19 June 2008, the Bureau of Naval Personnel Command (PERS-911) stated in a letter that you acquired insufficient points and were required to inform them of your intentions to resolve your status. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...