DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SJN
Docket No: 04101-09
11 March 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
15 July 1991. On 8 March 1992, you were medically evaluated and
diagnosed with a personality disorder. . Although you were found
not to be suicidal, you were deemed to be a risk to harm yourself
oer others. On 12 March 1992, you were notified of pending
administrative separation action due to your diagnosed
personality disorder. On 27 March 1992, your commanding officer
directed that you be honorably discharged. You were so
discharged on 14 April 1992. At that time, you were assigned a
RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and short
period of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that these
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to the reason for
your discharge or reenlistment code given the diagnosed
personality disorder and the fact that you were a risk to harm
yourself or others. An RE-4 reenlistment code is routinely
assigned under such circumstances. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. *
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
in this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\ en
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10226-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosis of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09515-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 December 1992 at age 21. At that time, you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01320-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your diagnosed personality disorder, and risk of harm to yourself. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08479-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnoses of a personality disorder and possible risk to harm yourself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06101-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02786-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2002 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 2 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05132-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 22 May 1992 the discharge authority approved an Your were so discharged on 28 May 1992 and Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07388-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, you were diagnosed with a severe At that time you Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07858-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your general discharge and reenlistment code should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder and insufficiently high conduct mark average. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07640-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2010. The Board found that you entered active duty in the Navy on 23 August 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.