Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03574-09
Original file (03574-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
' 2 NAVY ANNEX ,
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD: hd
Docket No. 03574-09
18 December 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

You requested removing the enlisted performance evaluation
reports for 16 November 2007 to 25 July 2008 and 26 July to 15
November 2008. You further requested advancement to chief petty
officer (pay grade E-7) with a date of rank and effective date
from the date you would have been advanced, had your advancement
not been withheld, with all back pay and allowances due.
Finally, you impliedly requested removing the service record
page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entry dated 25 July 2008 and
documentation of your removal from the Fiscal Year (FY) 09
Active Duty Chief Petty Officer Selection Board List..

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 December 2009, Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions
furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated B May 2009
with attachments, 15 May and 19 July 2009, the Commanding
Officer, U. S. Naval Mobile Construction Battalion ONE THIRTY
THREE letter dated 4 June 2009 with enclosure, the NPC PERS~-81i
letter dated 12 November 2009 to you, Subject: FY 09 Active Duty
Chief Petty Officer Selection Board Decision, and the Memo for
Record dated 15 September 2009, copies of which are attached.
The Board also considered your counsel's letter dated 14 August
2009,

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of prcbable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the advisory opinion's, except paragraph 4.d of
the advisory opinion dated 19 July 2009 (the Board found no
violation of Bureau of Naval Personnel Instruction 1430.16F,
section 721, as it was unable to find the command's
administrative action concerning your advancement was directed
as punishment or used as an alternative to disciplinary action),
and it particularly noted the Commanding Officer's letter of

4 June 2009. You may ask NPC to correct the service record page
13 entry dated 25 July 2008 by redacting the reference to
pending disciplinary action. In view of the above, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

Executive D

Enclosures

Copy to:

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03625-10

    Original file (03625-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request for investigation of the reporting Senior's actions was not considered, as the Board for Correction of Naval Records is not an investigative body. A three-member panel of the Board, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2010. The Board also considered the NPC e-mail dated 3 September 2009 with attachment (DD Form 214), a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 20 August 2009 with enclosures, 30 October 2009 and 2 February 2010.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09045-10

    Original file (09045-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket: 9045-10 28 Mar 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOR Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 PERS 843 of 2 Nov 10 G3) Meno fr) SC

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR413 13

    Original file (NR413 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your discharge of 10 August 2009 be voided; that you be awarded constructive service credit from 11 August 2009 to the date you would have attained 20 years of active duty service; ‘that all *red flag” actions be removed; that you be considered by a special selection board (SSB) for advancement to pay grade E-7; and that all records reflecting the substantiation of the sexual assault allegation against you be removed. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09826-10

    Original file (09826-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket: 09826-10 19 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tos Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner was selected for advancement at the next selection board. Whether Petitioner would have been selected by the FY-2010 selection board if it would have had the fitness report can never be known for certain.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09639-07

    Original file (09639-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 September 2003 to 8 June 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A; removing her failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards; and granting her a special selection board for the FY 06 Line Captain...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 9639-07

    Original file (9639-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 September 2003 to 8 June 2004, a copy of which is at Tab A; removing her failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06, 07 and 08 Line Captain Selection Boards; and granting her a special selection board for the FY 06 Line Captain...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11235-07

    Original file (11235-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11235-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) has removed from your Official Military Personnel File all documents referring or relating to the revocation of your security clearance.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11528-09

    Original file (11528-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2010. The Board particularly noted that on 8 February 2007, you submitted a copy of the report ending 31 October 2006 to the FY 08 Line Commander Selection Board, convened on 13 February 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09674-08

    Original file (09674-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 9674-08 2 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired Navy Reservist, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was advanced to chief petty officer (BUC; pay grade E-7) prior to retirement. ee and Messrs. | iii: and QM, ceviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02778-00

    Original file (02778-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You alleged that your spot promotion correspondence was mailed for consideration by the FY 00 First Quarter Spot Selection Board, convened on 5 November 1999. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...