DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 03414-09
20 April 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
20 April 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Records show that on 30 August 2007, your security clearance was
revoked due to “inappropriate personal conduct and lack of financial
responsibility”. Based on that revocation, your name was removed from
the FY 2006 Gunnery Sergeant Selection List on 15 July 2008. The
Board found no error or injustice in the actions taken by the Marine
Corps in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Loe le
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Diwettor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01449-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01259-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01303-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08545-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00917-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted the psychological reports that you submitted with your application and the applicable regulations that require the assignment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01194-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval records and ; applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01551-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 20 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07599-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions, except the statement, in paragraph 3.b of the advisory opinion dated 20 March 2009, that your reinstatement to corporal would require removing the NUP from your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13099-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 28 February 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02526-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. The Board found that you served in the Navy Reserve from 25 . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.