Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03400-09
Original file (03400-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TSR

 

Docket No: 3400-09
30 April 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 26 Mar 09 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 27 Apr 09
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in

effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his
failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year (FY)
2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered
by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his
category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as an officer who
has not failed of selection for promotion to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Bowen and
Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and
injustice on 30 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters
Marine Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of

Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect his request has
merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an error
and injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected so that he
will be considered by the earliest possible selection board
convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection
for promotion to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

POAEN of (Cant w
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 732.6(e)) and
having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby

announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive Dikecow

J

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01229-09

    Original file (01229-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures (except enclosure (2)), naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board finds Petitioner’s FY 2009 and 2010 failures should be removed as well, since the marks cited above were in his record for both of the promotion boards concerned, and removing all failures is necessary to restore Petitioner to the status he enjoyed, before the FY 2008 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, as an officer who...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06506-09

    Original file (06506-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of selection for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09249-09

    Original file (09249-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Vogt and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ‘Enclosure (2), the report of the PERB, reflects that Petitioner's request concerning the report for 31 May to 9 September 2006 was granted, but comments to the effect that Petitioner’s request to modify the report for 5...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02043-08

    Original file (02043-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year 2009 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08949-08

    Original file (08949-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over the subject matter concerned commented to the effect that the PERB action warranted removing Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 2009...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06568-08

    Original file (06568-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 6568-08 17 July 2008 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records From: To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: =.= REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief, specifically,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07687-08

    Original file (07687-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 25 September 1998 to 30 June 1999 (copy at Tab A) to remove the following from section K.4 (reviewing officer comments): “Recent challenges for this Officer [sic] reveal that he has the strength and skills to exceed, when given direction, what he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06201-08

    Original file (06201-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    “Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness reports for 22 February to 30 June 2002, 1 July to 9 December 2002 and 10 December 2002 to 30 March 2003, and filing in their place revised reports for the same periods. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09788-09

    Original file (09788-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In enclosure (3), MMOA-4, the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, commented to the effect that Petitioner's failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should not be removed, notwithstanding the PERB action, in view of the noncompetitive cumulative relative values in his fitness reports as a major, as well as a fitness report date gap. Notwithstanding enclosure (3), the Board finds Petitioner’s failures of selection to lieutenant colonel should be removed as well. b, That his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00296-10

    Original file (00296-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Active Reserve Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to...