DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE
Docket No. 03399-09
1l May 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 April 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board found that you
were properly discharged by reason of erroneous entry after it
was determined, while you were in an entry level status, that
you suffered from hepatitis. The fact that the hepatitis may
not have been discovered until much later in your enlistment had
you not volunteered to donate blood, does not provide a basis
for correcting your record to show that you received a “full
medical discharge”. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an.official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
OBERT D. SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06145-98
CoTection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member panel of the Board for session, considered your application on 13 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03988-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 2 oO oe
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03202-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discharge authority approved the request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04339-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board noted that the military departments may assign ratings only to those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty, and ratings are fixed as of the date of separation or permanent retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03409-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0732 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 6 March 2013, you were diagnosed with hepatitis B which existed prior to your enlistment and recommended for administrative separation. The Board noted that an RE-3E is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00508-01
to duty were denied and you received the bad conduct discharge on 27 September 1962. The Board concluded that there was no connection between the hepatitis and the offenses which resulted in your conviction and discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02347-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the ex’istence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08425-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After each of the first four periods of unauthorized absence you were counseled, warned of the possible consequences of further misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03562-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2001. As you waited several years to apply for reenlistment, the retention fitness standards were no longer applicable to you; unfortunately, you did not meet the more stringent procurement fitness standards, and you were denied the opportunity to reenlist. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...