Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03320-09
Original file (03320-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
SRP ART MEN) GF OY.) SP ANPY

 

BOs ji FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL Lo CORDS
oO NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTOM THD 20870-5100 .
CRS

Docket No; 3320-09
i Gobober 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your |
naval. record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . .
Records, sitting in executive gession,. considered your...
application on 30 September 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Docurientary ttaterial considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support

thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was

insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served in the Navy Reserve from 30
January 2004 to 7 September 2006, when you were discharged by
reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a general discharge.

You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4 as required by governing -
directives.

As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there ig no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not request such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the attached DD Form
293 to the NDRB.
Te is regrette. that the circwasthances of your case sre such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07039-09

    Original file (07039-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable BEGEURCRy regulations and. As your’ present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08576-09

    Original file (08576-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11291-10

    Original file (11291-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment status because of your failure to satisfactorily attend scheduled drills and misconduct as evidenced by your failure to pay just debts and misuse of a government credit card. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03398-09

    Original file (03398-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07947-09

    Original file (07947-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CRS Docket No: 7947-09 6 August 2009 This ig in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. : A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00345-09

    Original file (00345-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02138-09

    Original file (02138-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08014-09

    Original file (08014-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support chereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07926-09

    Original file (07926-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01856-09

    Original file (01856-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...