DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
“WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Lec
Docket No. 1613-09
26 May 09
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
26 May 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD letter, 4050 Ser
53G/036 of 3 April 2009, a copy of which is. attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the MEMbers of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
bo Veen
ly Nears
bp aes
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05253-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05074-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05158-09
7 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Additionally the Enlisted Master File (EMF) does not indicate the petitioner has reenlisted. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05189-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02788-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51600 LCC Docket No. 2788-09 26 May 09 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05159-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is’ an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05271-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07824-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05269-09
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive séssion, considered your application on 5 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06446-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your: application, together with all material submitted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.