DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 01545-09
20 March 2009
Dear NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06696-02
Although the enlisted performance board initially recommended discharge, this decision was changed after you submitted evidence that you had met the weight standards. The fitness report for the period 13 September 1986 to 14 February 1987 states as follows:(He) is leaving the Marine Corps after nineteen years of dedicated service, including an extended tour in the Republic of Vietnam. Consequently, the Board concluded that a correction to your record to show that you retired from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07415-00
You are requesting reinstatement in the Marine Corps, promotion You to GYSGT and retirement with 20 years of active service. The Board was aware that in 1995 the Marine Corps was being very Further, selective concerning the reenlistment of the decision whether to allow reenlistment is a matter that falls within the discretion of the Commandant of the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 2 record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 4 April 2000 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for one day of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded restriction for two months and a forfeiture of $2,556, all of which was suspended for six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01862-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. request to with back pay,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09294-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps for four years on 23 February 1966 at age 19. Your military...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900434
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion Issue 1:() .The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded based on his record of service which was good apart from a single period of misconduct. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided an upgrade would be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04602-02
In the next d. On 8 November 2001, the Board directed that Petitioner's record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 October 1996 vice being discharged on 9 October 1996. Sufficient retirement points, from He should then be The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand he retired in the grade of GYSGT. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06245-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) awarded him on 6 May 1998 and the competency review board proceedings that reduced him in rank. CONCLUSION: The Board concurs with the advisory opinion that the NJP In this regard, there is Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07166-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of the contested fitness report for 1 January to 2 February 1996. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 30 July 2002 with enclosures.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.In concluding that no further correction to your fitness report record...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00516
I was in the Marine corps going on 6 years. If it was serious enough for me to get discharged, then she should have been also. I was discharged 6 days after being told I was receiving another than honorable discharge.