DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No: 01516-09
2 April 2009
ee ee Tr Roe
This is in-reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 March 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 June 1986, and served
without disciplinary incident. However, on 26 February 1988, you
were counseled on poor judgment and misconduct while on liberty.
Then on 26 September 1988, you were counseled again for underage
drinking on base. Finally, on 30 July 1992, you were counseled
for your involvement with civil authorities for failure to report
a shooting incident involving another Marine, fraternizing with
junior Marines, and unsatisfactory conduct. Therefore, on 31
August 1992, you were separated at the end of your obligated
service with an honorable discharge, but you were not recommended
for reenlistment or promotion. Additionally, you were given an
RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and the passage of time. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing
your reenlistment code because of your misconduct. Accordingly,
your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Qa
W. DEAN PF R
Executive D or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01677-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that during the period from 22 October 1990 to 27 August 1991 you received counselling on 10 occasions regarding deficiencies in your performance and conduct, specifically, your alcohol related incidents during Operation Desert Shield, nonrecommendations for promotion,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07028-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009. You waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00142-09
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07001-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009. Subsequently, on 11 May 1992, an ADB unanimously found that you had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, and recommended discharge under other than honorablé ¢6Hditions.” Further, during the ADB proceeding, you confessed to the pending larceny charge involving the Navy Exchange. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01540-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07180-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board met on 25 September 1992 and found that you should be discharged due to a pattern of misconduct with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07936-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. On 18 March 1988, you were notified of pending administrative separation processing for an other than honorable (OTH) discharge for commission of a serious offense (having sex with a 15 year old female). On 13 April 1988, you received the OTH discharge for misconduct for commission of a serious offense, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02153-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2009. Documentary marerial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The ADB voted three to zero in favor of an under other than honorable discharge due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03581-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval urden is on the applicant to demonstrate the probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5434 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge Th ee board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...