Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00923-09
Original file (00923-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

CRS
Docket No: 923-09
12 February 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 December 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 August 1980.
On 20 December 1980 you made a statement that you were in bed
with a male airman recruit in the barracks, and on 17 February
1981 you freely admitted to engaging in bisexual behavior before
and during your service.

On 18 February 1981 your commanding officer recommended your
separation due to homosexual acts that were committed openly in
public view and on board a military installation. On 9 April
1981 you received a general discharge by reason of misconduct due
to homosexual acts.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
services, and the contentions that you are not homosexual and
that the reason for discharge is discriminatory. The Board
concluded that those factors were insufficient to demonstrate
that you were discharged in error or to warrant a change in the
reason and authority for your discharge. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
| Ree SR

FoaW. DEANJPFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03919-02

    Original file (03919-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were then notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by your failure to disclose your participation in service homosexual acts and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00816-06

    Original file (00816-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve in the Navy on 20 September 1978. On 6...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03917-02

    Original file (03917-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. of administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction and homosexuality, to consult legal counsel, present your case to an administrative discharge board, or to submit a statement in rebuttal to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2826 13

    Original file (NR2826 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support “hereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You reenlisted in the Navy on 20 September 1976 after more than four years of prior honorable service.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10542-09

    Original file (10542-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural right to legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), on 29 December 1981, your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7340 13

    Original file (NR7340 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. On 29 August 1980, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) recharacterized your service as general under honorable conditions by reason of unfitness.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05383-98

    Original file (05383-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thereafter, the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to homosexuality. On 29 May 1980, the Naval Discharge Review Board upgraded your undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. VnfitnessV1 as the reason At the time, this reason for separation was In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your service record for any mitigating factors which might warrant changing the reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01889 12

    Original file (01889 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board found an aggravating factor, namely your engaging in the act onboard a naval vessel.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04697-11

    Original file (04697-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, you were caught committing the act while onboard a naval vessel under aggravating circumstances, which is sufficient even under...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04

    Original file (04617-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...